Chalky

March 31, 2008

That’s the overused sports buzzword to describe the Final Four.  All #1 seeds.  Slightly annoying, since only one of the regional finals was really an exciting game.  Thank you, Davidson, for your efforts.  You were fun to watch, and oh-so-close to the Final Four.  And I would have been happy to see the Jayhawks miss out on the trip to San Antonio.

The 1s (except Kansas) dominated most all weekend, with large margins of victory.  They were very impressive in their victories, and since this weekend was so disappointing, I sincerely hope that their play translates into a truly great Final Four weekend. 

Kansas and UNC should be an interesting matchup, with so many stars we may need sunglasses to block the glare.  Hansbrough, Rush, Chalmers, Lawson, etc.  Add to that the storyline:  Roy goes home to UNC, breaking the hearts of Jayhawk Nation — only to finally win the big one, twice!  That brings Coach Self to Lawrence, a master at recruiting talent and turning up a bust in the NCAA tourney (think Bucknell or Bradley — or the fact that the Illini got knocked out a round earlier every year he was on the sidelines…).  The stuff talking heads love.

On the other side of the brackets, Memphis and UCLA should also be a good one.  Stellar offense.  Tough defense.  Fabulous freshman with names that can be used in all kinds of creative (I mean cheesy) headlines (think Loving UCLA; Memphis Smelling Like a Rose, etc.).  And for storylines, you’ve got Howland resurrecting Wooden’s famed program as the greatest college coach recovers from health problems.  I expect that we will hear at least a dozen best wishes for Coach Wooden.  And then there’s Calipari, and the recent rise of Memphis, as well.  More solid material for the analysts. 

I have to admit, I would prefer another special on Stephen Curry and Davidson.  Oh well.

My hopes for next weekend are close, exciting games that go to the buzzer.  And a few overtimes would be fun, too.  Although the national champ I picked (UCLA) is still in, I find it easier to cheer against teams than for teams.  So I just want good games. 

In the meantime, I’ll start settling into the rhythm of baseball…despite the Opening Day loss, this could be the year for the Cubs…


So It Begins

March 27, 2008

Another baseball season is almost upon us. Last year, I remarked that I had no expectations for the Cubs season, but in the literal sense of that phrase. That is, I didn’t mean that to say I thought they would suck. I actually didn’t not know what to expect. This year, I feel like I have a little bit better of a grasp. As I’ve pointed out, the Cubs spent the vast majority of last season playing at a rate that would’ve netted them 90+ victories, if extended out over an entire season. Assuming they can avoid another early season collapse, and assuming they are as good or slightly improved from last year (both large assumptions, I’ll grant), I see no reason why they can’t win 94ish games. And that should take this division with no problems. Milwaukee will be a challenge, but they have pitching issues. Dusty Baker will have his first year mojo going with the Reds, but they don’t have the talent depth to make a run at it.

However, winning a weak division doesn’t make you one of the big boys. So I’d summarize the outlook for the Cubs this way: If they do not make the playoffs, it will be a massive disappointment. If they do much beyond that, it will be a massive surprise. In other words, this year should turn out just about like last year, but hopefully with less agony along the way.

However, anything could happen. I’m not really sold on any NL team, even the Mets. That team is older than dirt and Willie Randolph is running out of duct tape. It’s not completely out of line to think that the Cubs could emerge from the NL. The AL, by contrast, is quite deep, but we only need to beat one AL team to win the World Series.

More specifically—

Rotation. This is an area of some concern for me. Carlos Zambrano…well, he really can’t be as bad as last year, can he? Furthermore, stats tell us he’s good for about 15 victories, perhaps a few more, in any given year—and that’s a rather big checkmark in the positive column. He is, however, probably the worst, most infuriating pitcher who can be counted on for 15 victories. Ted Lilly had a career year last year. Moving to the NL helped, but I’m not sure he can replicate what he did last year. He may not have to reach quite that level in order to help the Cubs (assuming other players hold up their end of the bargain *cough* Zambrano *cough*), but he can’t afford too much of a drop off.

I am not now, nor have I ever been, sold on the Ryan Dempster as starter experiment, and I think that if this goes bad it could go very bad. He’s already lost his closer job, so if he sucks, you can’t really send him back to the pen except as your long relief guy. And he can easily pitch away all his trade value with a crappy first month or two. I still say he should’ve been traded in the off-season. Jason Marquis, on the other hand, can boost his trade value with good first month or two. And history says he’s likely to give us just that. But then it’s going to have to be move, move, move—either to the pen or to another team.

Rich Hill needs to step it up, and there really is no longer or more analytical way of putting that. He’s long past the point of growing into his role as a major leaguer. I think Rich Hill has the stuff to establish himself as a legit #3 or even #2 starter if he has the year he’s capable of. Otherwise, he’s officially established himself as little more than a serviceable #5 starter, maybe a #4 on the right team. And as far as I’m concerned, Jon Leiber is nothing special. But, on the other hand, he’s not really being called upon to be anything special. He’s called upon to be, in effect, the 6th starter. And for that role, I think the vast majority of teams would take him in a second.

Bullpen. Will likely be the strength of the team. They already go pretty deep, and they’ve got some good arms in the farm system to boot. The only thing that concerns me is the lack of left-handers. Eyre’s on the shelf, and he took his good sweet time getting on track last year. At this rate, it could be July before he’s in form. Sean Marshall needs to be the pleasant surprise he’s been the last two years, albeit in a different spot this time.

Infield. Probably the biggest area of concern, in my opinion. Derrek Lee has the capability to have another huge year. But after two down years and one major injury, time and consistency aren’t on his side. I think he’ll be better than he has been, but his defense is the only area of his game that comes with any guarantees. Aramis Ramirez should be solid, and he better be in order to erase the memories of his playoff collapse. The middle infield is the major area for improvement. What I’ve seen this spring has convinced me that we need Brian Roberts, and I was not on board with that deal a few months back.

We need a true leadoff hitter. And while I love Ryan Theriot, and while he has many of the characteristics of a good leadoff hitter, he just doesn’t have them to the degree that a team with pennant aspirations needs. Mark DeRosa has done nothing to merit losing his job. But a team with Brian Roberts as the second baseman and DeRosa as the supersub is better than a team with DeRosa as the second baseman and no Brian Roberts. Plus, of the names I’ve heard thrown around for the Brian Roberts deal, most of them are players I have no trouble parting with. I know the deal is allegedly dead, but now that I’ve finally jumped the bandwagon I will be steadfast in my refusal to get off it.

And with the awesome twosome of Ronny Cedeno and Mike Fontenot as your back-up infielders, let’s just say this isn’t a particular area of depth. Geovany Soto appears to be an upgrade at catcher, but “appears” is the operative word here. We’re going on rather scant evidence.

Outfield. Level of concern pending. The Cubs may have two of the premier corner outfielders in the league, offensively and defensively. This assumes that Fukudome plays up to the level most are expecting, and that Soriano shows no lingering ill effects from last year’s leg injury. Honestly, I don’t know if Soriano’s got any wheels left, injury or no. We’ll see. Centerfield is an area of concern, a fact which hasn’t exactly been kept a secret. Pie has yet to prove that he can play on a major league level. Reed Johnson is a very nice addition, but a platoon of Johnson and Pie in centerfield seems no better than passable.

Daryle Ward is nominally the other back-up outfielder, but let’s be honest. He’s here as a pinch hitter, and little else. He does that well, but you can’t count on him for OF help. To that end, I find it very difficult to accept Murton’s dismissal from the 25-man roster. He’s got a solid OBP and is coming off a very good spring. If you can have only Felix Pie or Matt Murton, who do you really want? And yes, I know Murton’s not a centerfielder so we can’t actually make that one-for-one exchange. I’m just sayin’.

This is also another reason why the Brian Roberts deal helps. While I’m completely unimpressed with DeRosa’s outfield defense, he can play out there in RF, which gives you another off-the-bench option.

Manager. I’m not buying the notion that Lou Piniella is going to be more settled this year. The lineup is still all over the place, and I’m willing to suffer a few weeks of mayhem in order to find the one that works. Plus, there’s enough potential in the farm system that callups can be made if certain players don’t pan out, or get injured, etc. And then there’s the never-dying trade rumors. The moving and the switching can’t go on as long as it did last year, nor become as extreme as it was last year, but the idea that Lou’s suddenly going to come in with his lineup all neat and tidy is based on wishful thinking, in my opinion. He’s going to benefit from a year of tenure, and his willingness to try new things while retaining a decidedly old school edge is to be commended.

But fantasies about a settled roster and lineup are just that: fantasies.


Deja Vu

March 26, 2008

 The National Invitation Tournament championship game could feature Florida v. Ohio State.  Seen that one before? 

This is the first time in 30 years that neither team from the previous year’s NCAA championship didn’t make the tournament field the following year.  The last time that happened?  The year after Magic Johnson’s Spartans beat Larry Bird and Indiana State for the title.  And this could be the first time last year’s champion and runner up meet a year later in a different tournament.  Note to Billy and Thad — can’t you share the love a bit?  This theme is getting a bit old…


A Fan’s Request

March 26, 2008

Just let me watch the game. 

I love college basketball.  I love college football.  I’m learning to love baseball.  And I love watching my teams, even if they fall short.  It takes a lot to mar that enjoyment.  But I’ve learned it can happen.

Sometimes it isn’t easy to watch a game.  The Big Ten Network and Comcast conspired to make watching some college sports difficult.  More than once I’ve headed to a local establishment so I can watch — and not just listen — to a game.  And occasionally I go watch by myself (when TheWittyOne or TheSassyOne or a member of my Illini family/friends is not available).

I am a fan.  I love my team.  I’m passionate about the game (some might argue even a bit obsessive).  I know my boys.  I want to watch them.  And yes, I am female.

But just like any sports fan, when I say I want to watch the game, it means just that — I want to watch the game.  I don’t mind conversation about the game, a recent play or the team, especially with fellow fans.  But it must not detract or distract from the game.  When it does, I get annoyed.  After all, I just want to watch the game.  Even if I’m by myself.  That’s especially when I want to watch the game.

So please, save the non-essential comments and conversations for commercials.  Just like you, I’m watching the game.

Thank you.

p.s. Thanks to my fellow contributors for validating my desire to watch my teams under whatever circumstances are necessary.


Beyond the Brackets

March 25, 2008

How’s your bracket?  Mine’s busted, thanks primiarly to Davidson.  And yes, I do recall TheWittyOne saying that Georgetown was vulnerable to an upset from Davidson, who played a great non-conference schedule.  However, she didn’t mention how much fun Curry is to watch.  I guess she can have credit for the “almost pick.” 

But for me, March Madness is much more than just the brackets.  Yes, I agonized over the picks (and for the record, I have 11 of 16, 6 of 8, and 3 of 4 left, with my national champion still in the mix, but losing Georgetown hurt), and I even changed my mind a few times at the last minute (I lost faith in the Hoyas to take it all — good choice).

But shortly after 11 am CDT on Thursday, March 20, the first game tipped off, and my brackets didn’t matter anymore.  It was all about the games.  The passion.  The upsets. 

So I had Duke in my Elite 8 — how can you not cheer for Belmont to pull the upset?  They were impressive, and Duke was not.  The Blue Devils seemed to play with a sense of entitlement.  [News flash, boys -- you have to jump for rebounds.  They don't just fall into your hands.]  But Belmont played with heart.  And they were just seconds from knocking the mighty Dukies off.  Good stuff.  Of course, the Mountaineers proved to Duke that you can’t just turn it on to win, and so I still don’t mind the loss, even if it was to Huggy’s team.

Or take the thrilling finish of the Western Kentucky/Drake game.  So there was a lack of defense, the Bulldogs’ comeback to send it into overtime was great!  And although the Georgetown loss killed my brackets, I can’t help but cheer for Davidson.  Overall, there have been some great games.  American gave Tennessee a run, and Sienna made some noise.  Villanova — a 12 seed — needed their home jerseys.  It’s unpredictable, and that’s why I love it. 

Next weekend will be a bit less interesting, as the major programs tend to rise to the Final Four, but the games themselves often become more entertaining, so you really can’t go wrong.  I’m feeding my college basketball obsession and savoring the Madness.  Gotta love March.


I’m sure it’s happened to me before…

March 24, 2008

…but, up until this year, I honestly can’t remember losing one of my F4 picks in the first round. I can, however, remember one extra-special year in which I lost three of them in the second round. In that sense, I’m doing OK with 3/4 still remaining.

However, with only five of my Elite 8 remaining, things look grim. Times like these, I am a firm believer in shifting to Plan B. In the world of brackets, Plan B involves completely forgoing any mention of how your brackets are doing overall in favor of pointing to one or two particularly stunning upsets that you managed to pick correctly. For example: San Diego over UConn? Yeah, I was all over that. West Virginia over Duke? Saw that one coming from a mile away.

If this alone doesn’t suffice, then I also like to appeal to those picks I almost made. For example, back during pre-tourney bracket-picking, I believe I was heard to tell TheCleverOne that, in my ever humble opinion, I thought Davidson had a real shot at pulling off the upset of Georgetown, though I was not brave enough to actually pick that.

 No, really. I did. I did!


Bracketology [Or, I Spent Several Hours Analyzing, and All I Got Was This Sense of Self-Doubt]

March 19, 2008

It’s amazing to me how, year after year, there is such enthusiasm for the pursuit of bracketology. The vast, vast majority of the time, all bracketology does is give you an opportunity to look stupid. Then again, there is always the chance that you can win some cash if, by some miracle, you come out on top in your pool. In that sense, bracketology is a lot like any form of gambling, where the lure of the possible overwhelms common sense. But, at least if you lose at the casino, you can blame the roll of the dice or the spin of the wheel. If you lose here, you’ve got no one to blame but yourself, and nothing to blame but your dumb picks. But this bit of reality will not deter me in my quest to master the brackets.

However, given the choice, I’ll take an exciting tournament instead of an intact bracket all day long. I think that’s why last year was kind of a let down for me. I actually managed to predict all Final Four teams correctly, but that was only because last year’s tournament was the chalkiest chalk that ever chalked. And that’s just no fun.

This year, I found the Midwest and South brackets relatively easy to pick. Doesn’t mean my picks will actually be right, but at least the agonizing was kept to a blessed minimum. The East and the West were tougher, and the bottom half of the West in particular gave me fits.

So, without further ado, my picks:

Sweet 16: UNC, Notre Dame, Louisville, Butler, Kansas, Clemson, USC, Georgetown, Memphis, Pitt, Stanford, Texas, UCLA, Drake, Purdue, West Virginia.
Elite 8: UNC, Louisville, Clemson, USC, Pitt, Texas, UCLA, West Virgina.
Final 4: UNC, Clemson, Texas, UCLA.
Champ: UCLA over UNC.

Now, that gives me a very unchalky Elite 8. Seer-like foresight or wishful thinking? You decide.

Your upset specials are:

In the East: #11 St. Joe’s over #6 Oklahoma in the first round, and #7 Butler over #2 Tennessee in the second round.

In the Midwest: #10 Davidson over #7 Gonzaga in the first round, #6 USC over #3 Wisconsin in the second round and then over #2 Georgetown in the Sweet 16, and #5 Clemson over #1 Kansas in the Sweet 16.

In the South: #12 Temple over #5 Michigan State in the first round, #10 St. Mary’s over #7 Miami in the first round, and #4 Pitt over #1 Memphis in the Sweet 16.

In the West: #13 San Diego over #4 UConn in the first round, #6 Purdue over #3 Xavier in the second round, and #7 West Virginia over #2 Duke in the second round.


Dusting Off Those Dancing Shoes

March 11, 2008

March Madness.  It’s overflowing with bad cliches.  So please forgive me as I join the fun.

My recent schedule (which included a few days in the mountains with lots of snow and a great pair of skis) has kept me from following conference play as closely as I would like.  But as Selection Sunday approaches, it’s time to watch teams prepare to go dancing.

My boys won’t be at the party this year, but there will be plenty of other things to watch.  Take the Hoosiers, whose motto is “If you ain’t cheatin’, you ain’t competin’!” and their ex-coach, who fully supports that spirit.  Will they stumble or shine in the Big Dance? 

What about the #10-ranked team, mid-major Butler?  They have a new coach, a solid resume and a conference championship to secure their dance ticket. 

All of a sudden, teams like Ohio State care about San Diego beating Gonzaga for the WCC Championship, since that could burst their bubble.  Drake has put Des Moines on the map.  Meaningless trivia like know that the Oral Roberts mascot is the Golden Eagles has a place in office conversation.  And those who know Sienna’s tourney histroy can boast about it.  George Mason is in, and they get to be reminded about their Final Four run two years ago. 

The magic and madness of March are wrapped up in Cinderella teams, unexpected upsets, buzzer-beaters and the intensity of college players and fans.  Championship Week offers an exciting prelude to the Dance itself.  I’m looking forward to the Madness…


Brett Favre: An Appreciation

March 5, 2008

This may sound odd coming from a Bears fan, but I’m going to miss Brett Favre. I’m going to miss the excitement and tenacity he brought to the game. I’m going to miss the classy way he conducted himself. I’m going to miss all those times his all-or-nothing instincts got the better of him and one of his passes found its way into the arms of a Bears defender. Rivalries are no fun unless, deep down beneath the hate, you really do respect your opponent. And Favre has made this rivalry fun for over a decade and a half.

Thanks, Brett. We in Chicago owe you a debt of gratitude…and a punch in the mouth. [Only kidding on that last part. OK, maybe a little serious.]