February 27, 2008
So John Paxson finally made a deal happen, which raises his batting average (to borrow the terminology of another sport) to about .025, or something in that neighborhood. Let’s give him credit—a lot of credit, in fact—for dumping Ben Wallace and his albatross of a deal. But it’s not like he got a ton of talent or a ton of salary cap relief in return.
And, now that we’re a week or so post-deal, I think we can safely declare the Bulls pretty much unimproved. They’re 1-2 since the deal, and that win actually came before many of the newly acquired players had joined the team.
This is a team that needs do one of two things. Either they need to take a tremendous step forward, landing a big-name, big-impact player who can take the team to the oft discussed “next level.” Or, they need to take a giant step backward, acknowledging that their team, as currently constituted, isn’t going to reach the ultimate goal of a championship. So they retain a few key players but more or less clear the decks for a move back into the rebuilding process. This latter scenario concludes that, although the eighth spot in the playoffs remains there for the taking, the Bulls won’t make a deep run, so might as well start looking to the future.
With the trade deadline come and gone, it appears the Bulls are interested in neither. They’re still just treading water, albeit with a different group of players. And that’s about the worst thing they could’ve done. Maybe it gives them more moveable parts to make a great trade during the off-season. Then again, we’ve been waiting for that for about 3 years now.
1 Comment |
basketball |
Permalink
Posted by TheWittyOne
February 12, 2008
Although this latest flare-up in the steroid controversy has often left us with more questions than answers, one thing I have learned is why Roger Clemens employs both Rusty Hardin and Randy Hendricks. Not that I was wondering about this in particular, but sometimes knowledge arrives unbidden. Both gentlemen have proven themselves to be arrogant, windbagish asshats—and you know what they say about birds of a feather.
One of Hendricks’ most notable stunts was the release of a statistical analysis that demonstrated that Clemens’ late-career statistics were not all that unusual, or so he claimed. When a panel of professors took it upon themselves to do their own analysis, they came up with a rather different conclusion. They concluded that the results “strongly hint” that Clemens might have been engaged in some “unusual” activity.
Hendricks responds that, “The professors make the mistake of thinking that his career arc should look like the arc of every other pitcher in their selected group.” Oh Randy, Randy, you hypocrisy-deaf tool, you. It was your intelligent idea to compare Roger’s stats to the stats of other pitchers. It was your intelligent idea to suggest that such comparisons might prove instructive on the question of steroids. It was your intelligent idea to posit that similarities should be uncovered and trumpted from 18,000-word documents. And now you think that looking for similarities is a mistake? Now you think that the significance of these similarities is based on a mistaken assumption? Which is it, then? Can we suss out steroid use by looking for statistical similarities, or is that faulty logic? You don’t get to play this one both ways. First it’s “gee, look at all these awesome similarities.” Then it’s “similarities…only a fool would think that we should find major similarities here.” Do please make up your mind.
Otherwise, I guess your meticulously researched report isn’t good for much then, unless I run out of toilet paper.
Keep digging, fellas. That hole is not quite deep enough yet.
Leave a Comment » |
baseball |
Permalink
Posted by TheWittyOne
February 7, 2008
We are in the heart of college basketball season, and the think tank at the Worldwide Leader has dubbed this week “Rivalry Week.” Makes sense. There was a great game in the Raleigh-Durham area last night — even though I couldn’t cheer for either team. Good basketball. The “Backyard Brawl” came down to a last-second shot that left Huggy Bear and his Mountaineers just short. Pitt wins again.
And, of course, I’m enjoying the Big Ten rivalry game of the night. If I’m being honest, I can admit it’s a down year for the conference. But that doesn’t stop the talking heads at ESPN. They know how to create a compelling storyline, and this game has a perfect one to fit the “Rivalry Week” theme. Indiana v. Illinois — a heated rivalry at any time (thanks to Bobby and Lou) — reached a new level. Freshman star Eric Gordon v. the nation he spurned. Crazy orange-clad fans booing every time he touches the ball. Good stuff. I must confess that I’m tired of this storyline. Of course the kid can change his mind, but part of the fun of college sports is that the fans can hate him for that change of mind. At least it’s a good game…
Random thought: I can’t help but wonder what Bobby’s up to tonight…is he watching his old team with his feet up, now that he has entered the ranks of the retired?
Leave a Comment » |
college basketball |
Permalink
Posted by TheCleverOne